|
One of my favorite all-time films is David Lean’s
1962 masterpiece, Lawrence of Arabia. The factual accuracy of
this work may be questionable, but the depiction of Colonel T.E.
Lawrence’s exploits in the Arabian Desert during World War One left
an indelible impression on my mind: I wanted to explore the subject
further. I began to study the great war against the Ottoman Empire,
and the subsequent creation of artificial “spheres of influence” by
France and Great Britain. I began to realize that a direct
relationship exists between U.S. troops fighting and dying in Iraq
today, and the political aftermath of World War I in the Middle
East.
The idea for the documentary, Blood and Oil, occurred to me
about three years ago. While many outstanding programs about the
Great War have already been produced, they usually focus on the
Western Front and the terrible waste of humanity in the trenches of
France. When fighting in the Middle East is mentioned, the Gallipoli
campaign – and the exploits of Lawrence in the Arab Revolt – are the
main topics covered.
However, the Middle East struggle takes in an expansive and complex
theater of operations, ranging from the Dardanelles Straits to the
oil fields in Baku, on the Caspian Sea. The battles – military and
political – feature several intriguing key players: Turkish Minister
of War Enver Pasha, British General Edmund Allenby, German General
Liman von Sanders, Arabian Prince Feisal, and Turkish General
Mustafa Kemal. The Ottoman Empire became the target of invasion not
only by the British, but also French, Russian, Greek and Armenian
forces. While desperately fighting off the invasion at Gallipoli,
the Ottoman Army also faced Russian invaders from the east, and
British-East Indian troops in both Palestine and Iraq. How the Turks
– with fewer men, artillery and resources – managed to hold out over
four years of intensive combat is truly a remarkable story.
When the battles stopped on the Western Front in November 1918, the
war in the Middle East went on – another four years of brutal
combat, fought in temperatures ranging from 150 degrees in Iraq to
30 degrees below zero in the Caucasus. A Turkish nationalist
movement, led by Mustafa Kemal, rejected the Anglo-French plan to
carve up the Ottoman Empire among themselves and their allies. A new
Turkish Army rose from the ashes of defeat. First, it drove Armenian
forces out of eastern Turkey, then turned back French and Armenian
troops in the south. Finally, Kemal launched a counter-offensive
against a Greek Army invading from the west – all of this, while
Europe began to recover in its newfound peace.
Turkey fought back to reclaim its homeland, much to the surprise of
Europe. But France and Great Britain found other lands to dominate
with post-war politics. New nations were created, their borders
dictated by European greed for land and oil. Without much regard for
the region’s history, culture, religion and ethnicity, artificial
states emerged: Palestine, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Iran, and Saudi
Arabia. These “nations” secured the interests of France and Great
Britain, but not the interests of the Muslim inhabitants: Sunnis,
Shias, Arabs and a host of others.
Thus, the stage was set for political instability and violent
struggle in the Middle East that continues to the present day.
Western interests continue to collide with Muslim factions that are
fueled by hatred toward the West. It is difficult to ignore some
parallels between the distant and recent past. Places such as Basra,
Baghdad, Mosul and Gaza are the scenes of struggle and foreign
occupation, just as they were nine decades ago. The civil war that
now rages in Iraq is reminiscent of Muslim revolts against British
troops in 1920, and again in 1925.
The West continues to intervene in the Middle East, to support
friendly governments and ensure the flow of oil to European and U.S.
economies. Most recently, the United States sent troops to Iraq, but
the same thing happened back in November 1914. When Britain declared
war against the Ottoman Empire, the very first thing it did was to
land troops near Basra to protect the oil fields in nearby Iran.
Later in the war, the British captured Mosul – just as U.S. forces
did in 2003 – to make certain that rich Iraqi oil reserves were
covered by the Union Jack.
To understand more clearly as to why the Middle East remains
embroiled in strife, we only need to examine the historical record.
Blood and Oil chronicles the immensity of a horrific military
struggle and its tremendous impact on the entire world. The seeds of
discontent in the Middle East were sown 90 years ago, via military
conquest and political domination from Europe. Unfortunately, those
seeds have grown into a fearful harvest that continues to feed
radicals, fanatics and terrorists in the Muslim World.
|